About six months later I heard they were making a movie
Then the movie was released and everyone said the movie was terrible.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8236f/8236f2705cb0a23ca594ce4742fc14782a35202c" alt=""
I figured that they meant the acting was bad. I figured wrong.
The acting was fine. I even think Natalie Portman did a pretty good job. Bana was flat, as usual, but I nearly bought him as King Henry VIII.
What sucked was either the screenplay or the editing. I know my English history, I read the book, I watch The Tudors
Really, they should have gone back to watch it just to make sure the film made sense. I'm pretty sure there were scenes left on the cutting room floor explaining what happened to Mary's first husband. Actually, I think a lot of the scenes were left out and instead they just left in a lot of wide shots of people walking down halls because the sets and costumes were far superior to any dialogue.
I give it two stars, but only because I liked the book.
ps - Scarlett Johansson sure is wearing a lot of makeup in the movie poster. I noticed specifically that they weren't wearing much makeup during the movie. I thought it was a good choice considering the era.
No comments:
Post a Comment